NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

Stakeholder Presentation

NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4: Hello everyone, I am —-, and I am working as a nurse at Tampa General Hospital. At this moment, I’ll deliver my donation to my stakeholder group, which includes the sanitarium administration and healthcare professionals similar to croakers, druggists, IT specialists, and nurses. Let’s bandy the program for a moment. 

Agenda

The following outlines will be mooted in this donation. 

• Organizational healthcare issue 
• Interdisciplinary team approach and its connection 
• Summary of the Interdisciplinary Plan 
• Adoption and operation of resources 
• Evaluation and estimation 

Organizational Healthcare Issue 

The specific organizational issue our sanatorium is facing is the increasing rates of medicine-related crimes. Medicine crimes do occur regularly due to poor communication and collaboration among healthcare professionals and the ineffectiveness of medicine safety programs. The staff needs help to conduct effective interdisciplinary team collaboration. All these factors affect medicine crimes, ultimately impacting patient safety and experience. Medicine crimes are a global healthcare issue causing adverse health and financial implications (Souza et al., 2019). 

Medicine crimes are preventable negative incidents that can harm cases due to indecorous medicine use. Annually, roughly 237 million medicine crimes occur, of which 68 million are clinically significant. Roughly 50-70.2% of crimes can be avoided by administering safe medicine operation strategies (World Health Organization, 2022). 

Solving Medication Errors 

The community should pay attention to addressing this association’s issue, as it directly impacts patient safety and individual well-being. Medicine crimes contribute to fresh treatment conditions due to patient detriment. By preventing these crimes, the safety of cases is enhanced, and the trouble of adverse responses can be minimized (Di Muzio et al., 2019). Working medicine crimes can boost the quality of care handed to cases, as they have a right to acquire safe care treatments and palliate their affections without further worsening their health conditions due to these crimes (Tawfik et al., 2019). 

A high frequency of medicine crimes erodes cases’ trust in healthcare. Precluding medicine crimes can strengthen cults and foster positive connections with healthcare professionals (Prentice et al., 2020). Initially, the legal consequences and action can be prevented by complying with ethical morals and legal scores of care treatments (Liu et al., 2020). Without addressing medicine crimes, patient detriment can lead to death, legal consequences, and eroded trust in healthcare professionals. 

The interdisciplinary team approach and its relevance 

The interdisciplinary team strategy is particularly applicable to address the issue of medicine crimes in several ways. Most medicine crimes occur due to poor collaboration and communication among healthcare professionals, conducting interdisciplinary team meetings, or using technology to grease communication among staff. This will help medicine crimes and promote patient safety. Interprofessional team members can identify the root causes and conduct comprehensive trouble assessments (Manias et al., 2020). This leads to developing and administering applicable strategies to address those causes of medicine crimes. 

This approach also fosters a terrain to promote continuity of care by addressing medicine crimes from tradition to administration stages. The interdisciplinary team can observe the holistic approach by examining the entire medicine process and assessing the social, cerebral, and organizational factors contributing to these crimes, such as communication breakdowns, system failures, and individual misapprehensions (Mieiro et al., 2019). Consequently, the team members can coordinate to target the factors and develop the right strategies. This will lead to better health issues and help achieve the thing of reducing medicine crimes (Souza et al., 2019). 

Interdisciplinary Plan Summary

The interdisciplinary plan aims to reduce the number of adverse medicine events and patient detriment by efficiently integrating Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in our sanatorium. The absolute thing is to enhance patient safety and produce a culture of continuous improvement aligning with the organizational outgrowth, i.e., patient satisfaction. 

Possibilities of Interdisciplinary Plan to Work

Integration and performance of EHR can address medicine crimes by adding customized features, including adverts for implicit drug relations, medical concession, and cure-checking rates (Gildon et al., 2019). Furnishing respectable training to healthcare professionals on using EHR efficiently could reduce medicine crimes. Staff members will be better informed about cases’ health conditions and will give the applicable drug to them (DiAngi et al., 2019). The EHR will promote indefectible and streamlined communication and can give real-time updates on a case’s medicine changes (Vos et al., 2020). 

Role of Interdisciplinary Team to Implement Plan

The interdisciplinary team consisting of the sanatorium director and healthcare professionals, including croakers, nurses, apothecaries, information technologists, nurse informaticists, and nurses, will work together to execute the interdisciplinary plan to avoid medicine crimes. The sanatorium director will ensure that the healthcare pool receives respectable training on the use of EHRs by IT technologists and nurse informaticists (Wilbanks & Aroke, 2020). 

The IT technologists and nurse informaticists will collaboratively handpick the dealer and supervise the integration of EHRs. Also, they will give any unborn variations grounded on the results attained to ensure nonstop enhancement. The healthcare pool will be the primary users of EHR to promote medicine safety. They will contemporize medicine-related changes in EHR to grease communication and collaboration (Robertson et al., 2022). 

Implementation of Interdisciplinary Plan 

An interdisciplinary plan will be executed by following the PDSA cycle, which ensures continuous improvement in managing medicine crimes. The PDSA stands for the Plan, Do, Study, Act cycle, which will help associations in iterative testing and refinement of medicine operation (Moser et al., 2020). Following are the ways by which the PSDA cycle will help apply the interdisciplinary plan of installing and nearly using the EHRs within healthcare associations. 

Plan

In this stage, the unambiguous pretensions for EHR integration will be defined, analogous to perfecting effectiveness, reducing medicine crimes, enhancing quality of care, and meeting nonsupervisory conditions. The pretensions will be specific, measurable, applicable, and time-bound. Also, the stakeholders primarily involved in medicine operation and taking EHR use will be linked. These stakeholders will be healthcare professionals, the IT labor force, and sanatorium administration (Carr et al., 2023). Initially, the plan will be developed considering the conditions of EHR integration and performance, analogous to tackling software selection, workflow redesigning, training and education, and data migration. 

Do

The plan will be executed by integrating EHR and training staff members to transition to EHR for medicine tradition and administration. Likewise, the data will be gathered to observe the issues and performance pointers (Carr et al., 2023). 

Study

In this stage, the collected data will be observed and estimated to identify any areas for improvement. Likewise, case and healthcare professional feedback will be attained to understand the user experience and case satisfaction. Initially, the challenges and successes will be measured to make room for advancements or sustain the current changes (Carr et al., 2023). 

Act

The final stage will involve vindicating the integration of the EHR and addressing the affiliated issues. The healthcare pool will upgrade the processes to enhance performance and reduce medicine crimes. This will affect the perpetration of an acclimated plan and nonstop enhancement by repeating the change process throughout the PSDA cycle (Carr et al., 2023). 

Management of Human and Financial Resources

The interdisciplinary plan is so advanced that it ensures effective operation of resources without any chances of wasting them. mortal resources are employed to produce a plan for the integration and practicality of EHRs. A communication plan is developed to keep staff informed about EHR integration, and the EHR experts can proactively address their enterprises (Crowley et al., 2019). 

They will also apply training programs to enhance staff proficiency in using EHR for medicine operation. Ultimately, mortal resources will be enabled to effectively use EHRs and help medicine crimes by safe medicine administration as per the case’s health conditions. In two ferocious care departments of a community sanatorium, the healthcare pool was suitable to reduce medicine crimes by using EHRs effectively (Carayon et al., 2021). 

The fiscal coffers are employed to effectively integrate EHRs, which includes opting merchandisers, installing software, and copping

necessary outfit similar to computers and tablets. Also, there are costs involved in furnishing training and education to the healthcare pool. The financial resources are managed by planning a budget that includes costs while considering the system’s budget (Aguirre et al., 2019). 

NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

The resources are also allocated based on the prioritized areas and critical conditions. Likewise, a Return on Investment (ROI) analysis is performed to assess the financial impact of EHR performance. The advancements are measured in reducing crimes, saving fresh time and costs of medicine crimes, and furnishing effective care (Aguirre et al., 2019). Initially, the EHR performance will be done on a small scale, and the extension to other departments will be handed off after thorough evaluation to ensure continuous advancements and sustain these changes. 

A 260-bed sanatorium estimated the EHR performance and designed the workflows for each department to manage financial resources and adopt this technology to ameliorate the quality of care and reduce medicine crimes (Aguirre et al., 2019). In another study conducted in North America, the EHR performance increased per-case costs from $67750 to $5026000, but the costs can be reduced after data structure is attained (McCord et al., 2019). 

Evaluation

The successful issues of the design will be as follows: 

• Reduced medicine crimes and safe medicine delivery 
• Advanced quality of care 
• Enhanced patient safety 
• Reduced length of stay at sanatorium 
• Enhanced patient satisfaction and job satisfaction (Manias et al., 2020) 
• The criteria that can be employed to measure success include 

Patient Satisfaction

Case satisfaction is an indirect system of determining the success of this plan. When medicine crimes are reduced and cases admit the correct medicine, their health issues will be bettered, leading to a quick recovery. This will cultivate patient satisfaction, and feedback from cases can be collected to assess their satisfaction with care treatment and determine whether the plan is successful (Kieval et al., 2020). 

Measuring the Medication Errors 

This is the direct system of measuring the success of this plan. Comparing the rate of medicine crimes pre- and post-implementation of EHR can give a clear idea of the success of this plan. Still, the plan shows its success if medicine crimes are reduced after using EHR. Still, further advancements must be made to address the challenges and pitfalls (Manias et al., If medicine crimes increase, 2020). 

Conclusion

To add up, I mooted the prevailing issue of medicine crimes at Tampa General Hospital and demanded my cult’s attention as precious stakeholders. This issue requires keen attention as it impacts patient safety. The interdisciplinary plan summary is to integrate the EHRs as medicine error prevention technology. This requires the use of the PDSA approach for effective performance. Also, various styles effectively manage the financial and moral resources. Initially, the success of this plan is estimated by measuring patient satisfaction and comparing medicine error frequency before and after the performance of EHRs. Thank you. 

NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

DiAngi, Y. T., Stevens, L. A., Halpern-Felsher, B., Pageler, N. M., & Lee, T. C. (2019). The Electronic Health Record (EHR) training program identifies a new tool to quantify the EHR time burden and improves providers’ perceived control over their workload in the EHR. JAMIA Open, 2(2), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz003

Di Muzio, M., Dionisi, S., Di Simone, E., Cianfrocca, C., Di Muzio, F., Fabbian, F., Barbiero, G., Tartaglini, D., & Giannetta, N. (2019). Can nurses’ shift work jeopardize the patient’s safety? A systematic review. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 23(10), 4507–4519. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201905_17963 

Gildon, B., Condren, M., & Hughes, C. (2019). Impact of electronic health record systems on prescribing errors in pediatric clinics. Healthcare, 7(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020057 

Kieval, J. Z., Al-Hashimi, S., Davidson, R. S., Hamilton, D. R., Jackson, M. A., LaBorwit, S., Patterson, L. E., Stonecipher, K. G., & Donaldson, K. (2020). Prevention and management of refractive prediction errors following cataract surgery. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 46(8), 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000269 

Liu, J., Liu, P., Gong, X., & Liang, F. (2020). Relating medical errors to medical specialties: A mixed analysis based on litigation documents and qualitative data. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 335–345. https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s246452 

Manias, E., Kusljic, S., & Wu, A. (2020). Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings: A systematic review. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 11(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098620968309 

NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

Mc Cord, K. A., Ewald, H., Ladanie, A., Briel, M., Speich, B., Bucher, H. C., & Hemkens, L. G. (2019). Current use and costs of electronic health records for clinical trial research: A descriptive study. CMAJ Open, 7(1), E23–E32. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20180096 

Mineiro, D. B., Oliveira, É. B. C. de, Fonseca, R. E., P. da, Mininel, V. A., Zem-Mascarenhas, S. H., Machado, R. C. (2019). Strategies to minimize medication errors in emergency units: an integrative review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 72(1), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0658 

Moser, T., Edwards, J., Pryor, F., Manson, L., & OʼHare, C. (2020). Workflow improvement and the use of PDSA cycles. Quality Management in Health Care, 29(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/qmh.0000000000000245 

Prentice, J. C., Bell, S. K., Thomas, E. J., Schneider, E. C., Weingart, S. N., Weissman, J. S., & Schlesinger, M. J. (2020). Association of open communication and the emotional and behavioral impact of medical error on patients and families: A statewide cross-sectional survey. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(11), 883–894. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010367

Robertson, S. T., Rosbergen, I. C. M., Burton-Jones, A., Grimley, R. S., & Brauer, S. G. (2022). The effect of the electronic health record on interprofessional practice: A systematic review. Applied Clinical Informatics, 13(03), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748855 

Souza, A. F. R. de, Queiroz, J. C. de, Vieira, A. N., Solon, L. G. da S., & Bezerra, É. L. de S. F. (2019). Medication errors and their risk factors are inherent to the medicinal prescription. Enferm Foco, 10(4), 12–16. https://enfermfoco.org/en/article/medication-errors-and-their-risk-factors-inherent-to-the-medicinal-prescription/ 

Tawfik, D. S., Scheid, A., Profit, J., Shanafelt, T., Trockel, M., Adair, K. C., Sexton, J. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2019). Evidence relating health care provider burnout and quality of care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 171(8), 555. https://doi.org/10.7326/m19-1152 

Vos, J. F. J., Boonstra, A., Kooistra, A., Seelen, and medicalnbeek, M. (2020). The influence of electronic health record use on collaboration among medical specialties. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 676. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05542-6

NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

Wilbanks, B. A., & Aroke, E. N. (2020). Using clinical situations to train healthcare professionals to use electronic health records. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 38(11). https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000631 

World Health Organization. (2022). What is a medication error? https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/librariesprovider2/country-sites/medication-error-wpsd-final.pdf?sfvrsn=e5853e2a_1&download=true 

References

Aguirre, R. R., Suarez, O., Fuentes, M., & Sanchez-Gonzalez, M. A. (2019). Electronic health record perpetration A review of coffers and tools. Cureus, 11 (https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5649 

Carayon, P., Wetterneck, T. B., Cartmill, R., Blosky, M. A., Brown, R., Hoonakker, P., Kim, R., Kukreja, S., Johnson, M., Paris, B. L., Wood, K. E., & Walker, J. M. (2021). The study examines drug safety in two intensive care units of a community teaching hospital following the implementation of electronic health records, considering sociotechnical and human factors. Journal of Patient Safety, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000358 

Carr, L. H., Christ, L., and Ferro, D. F. published their work in 2023. The electronic health record as a quality enhancement tool. Conventions in Perinatology, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2023.01.008

Crowley, K., Mishra, A., Cruz-Cano, R., Gold, R., Kleinman, D., and Agarwal, R. published their work in 2019. Electronic health record perpetration findings at a large, suburban health and mortal services department. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 25(1), E11–E16. https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000000768

Step-by-Step Breakdown

1. Identify the Issue
   • Highlighted drug crimes at Tampa General Hospital as the organizational problem.
   • Emphasized their effect on patient safety, trust, and legal counteraccusations.
2. Explain Relevance to Stakeholders
   • It was explained to the stakeholders why they should pay attention, including directors, IT, croakers, druggists, and nurses.
3. Introduce Interdisciplinary Approach
   • Showed how collaboration and communication can help prevent crimes.
   • Each professional group’s locations were outlined in detail.
4. Present Interdisciplinary Plan
   • Integration of Electronic Health Records (EHRs).
   • Training for all healthcare professionals.
   • Advanced communication and drug conciliation.
5. Use Change Model
   • Applied the PDSA cycle (Plan-Do-Study-Act) for nonstop enhancement.
6. Manage Resources
   • Mortal training, IT support, nanny informaticists.
   • Fiscal budgeting for tackling software expenses, vendor contracts, and training costs.
7. Evaluate Success
   • Success is measured by reduction in drug crimes and increased patient satisfaction.
8. Conclude & Persuade
   • I reiterated the significance of stakeholder buy-in.
   • Stressed nonstop monitoring and advancements.

Overview

This assessment focuses on addressing medicine crimes at Tampa General Hospital through an interdisciplinary stakeholder donation. The plan emphasizes EHR performance, team collaboration, and resource operation using the PDSA model for quality improvement. The thing is to enhance patient safety, reduce medicine-related detriment, and improve organization. This will enhance effectiveness and increase satisfaction for both guests and staff. The donation highlights stakeholder arrears, financial implications, and evaluation strategies to ensure long-term sustainability. 

FAQs

Q1: Why concentrate on medicine crimes? 

Medicine crimes are a leading cause of preventable detriment worldwide. Addressing them improves safety, trust, and organizational issues. 

Q2: How will EHR help reduce medicine crimes? 

EHRs give features like automated cautions, cure checks, and real-time communication, which help define and administer misapprehensions. 

Q3: What is the part of stakeholders? 

Directors ensure resources and training. 

IT/nurse informaticists Integrate and support EHR systems. 

Physicians/nurses/apothecaries Safely define, administer, and examine specifics. 

Q4: How will success be measured? 

We’ll measure success by comparing pre- and post-implementation error rates, patient satisfaction checks, and staff feedback. 

Q5: What if the plan fails firstly? 

The PDSA cycle allows for iterative acclimations, inciting continuous knowledge and advancements.